4.3 Article

Bathymetric control of surf zone retention on a rip-channelled beach

期刊

OCEAN DYNAMICS
卷 64, 期 8, 页码 1221-1231

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10236-014-0747-0

关键词

Rip current; Surf zone retention; Numerical modelling; Rip spacing; Surf zone width; Drifters

资金

  1. NSF [OCE-0926750]
  2. project BARBEC [ANR N2010 JCJC 602 01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Simulations from a numerical model address the impact of nearshore morphology on surf zone retention on, open coast, rip-channelled beaches exposed to shore-normal waves. In the model, rip channels are regularly spaced alongshore with a given spacing lambda. For a given reference case bathymetry (lambda= 200 m), rip current circulations retain floating material at a hourly rate R of about 80 % which is in line with most existing field and laboratory studies in similar settings. The influence of a surf zone rip-channel morphology on surf zone retention is evaluated by a number of morphologic parameters. Results show that rip spacing is important. The ratio of the surf zone width X (s) to rip spacing lambda controls surf zone retention with R rapidly increasing with increasing X (s) /lambda up to a threshold of about 1 above which R levels off to become asymptotic to 100 %. The impact of the presence of a rip head bar is profound but nonlinear. The onset of wave breaking across the rip head bar drives a weak seaward located circulation providing major pathways for surface water exiting the surf zone compartment. Additional simulations suggest that alongshore variations in the offshore bathymetry are important. Patterns in the wave field enforced by wave refraction and potentially wave breaking across offshore bathymetric anomalies can provide a conduit for transporting floating material out of the surf zone and into the inner shelf region. This has major implications for surf zone flushing by inner-bar rips on multiple-barred beaches and on beaches facing bathymetric anomalies on the inner shelf.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据