4.3 Article

On the assessment of Argo float trajectory assimilation in the Mediterranean Forecasting System

期刊

OCEAN DYNAMICS
卷 61, 期 10, 页码 1475-1490

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10236-011-0437-0

关键词

Ocean modeling; Data assimilation; Argo floats

资金

  1. Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Bologna
  2. European Commission [SPA.2007.1.1.01, 218812-1-FP7-SPACE 2007-1]
  3. Galostiftelsen Stockholm
  4. Foundation Blanceflor Ludoviso-Boncompagni, nee Bildt

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Mediterranean Forecasting System (MFS) has been operational for a decade, and is continuously providing forecasts and analyses for the region. These forecasts comprise local- and basin-scale information of the environmental state of the sea and can be useful for tracking oil spills and supporting search-and-rescue missions. Data assimilation is a widely used method to improve the forecast skill of operational models and, in this study, the three-dimensional variational (OceanVar) scheme has been extended to include Argo float trajectories, with the objective of constraining and ameliorating the numerical output primarily in terms of the intermediate velocity fields at 350 m depth. When adding new datasets, it is furthermore crucial to ensure that the extended OceanVar scheme does not decrease the performance of the assimilation of other observations, e.g., sea-level anomalies, temperature, and salinity. Numerical experiments were undertaken for a 3-year period (2005-2007), and it was concluded that the Argo float trajectory assimilation improves the quality of the forecasted trajectories with similar to 15%, thus, increasing the realism of the model. Furthermore, the MFS proved to maintain the forecast quality of the sea-surface height and mass fields after the extended assimilation scheme had been introduced. A comparison between the modeled velocity fields and independent surface drifter observations suggested that assimilating trajectories at intermediate depth could yield improved forecasts of the upper ocean currents.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据