4.5 Review

The prevalence of mental health disorders in (ex-)military personnel with a physical impairment: a systematic review

期刊

OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE
卷 72, 期 4, 页码 243-251

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2014-102207

关键词

-

资金

  1. Blind Veterans UK
  2. UK Ministry of Defence

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Having a visual, hearing or physical impairment (defined as problems in body function or structure) may adversely influence the mental well-being of military personnel. This paper reviews the existing literature regarding the prevalence of mental health problems among (ex-) military personnel who have a permanent, predominantly, physical impairment. Method Multiple electronic literature databases were searched for relevant studies (EMBASE (1980-January 2014), MEDLINE (1946-January 2014), PsycINFO (2002-January 2014), Web of Science (1975-January 2014)). Results 25 papers were included in the review, representing 17 studies. Studies conducted among US military personnel (n=8) were most represented. A range of mental health disorders were investigated; predominately post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), but also depression, anxiety disorder (excluding PTSD), psychological distress and alcohol misuse. The findings indicate that mental health disorders including PTSD (range 2-59%), anxiety (range 16.1-35.5%), depression (range 9.7-46.4%) and psychological distress (range 13.4-36%) are frequently found whereby alcohol misuse was least common (range 2.2-26.2%). Conclusions Common mental health disorders were frequently identified among (ex-) military personnel with a physical impairment. Adequate care and support is necessary during the impairment adaptation process to facilitate the psychosocial challenges (ex-) military personnel with an impairment face. Future research should be directed into factors impacting on the mental well-being of (ex-) military personnel with an impairment, how prevalence rates vary across impairment types and to identify and act on specific needs for care and support.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据