4.5 Article

Exposure and genetics increase risk of beryllium sensitisation and chronic beryllium disease in the nuclear weapons industry

期刊

OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE
卷 68, 期 11, 页码 842-848

出版社

B M J PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/oem.2010.064220

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIEHS/NIH [P01 ES011810]
  2. NCRR/NIH [1 UL1 RR025780]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives Beryllium sensitisation (BeS) and chronic beryllium disease (CBD) are caused by exposure to beryllium with susceptibility affected by at least one well-studied genetic host factor, a glutamic acid residue at position 69 (E69) of the HLA-DP beta chain (DP beta E69). However, the nature of the relationship between exposure and carriage of the DP beta E69 genotype has not been well studied. The goal of this study was to determine the relationship between DP beta E69 and exposure in BeS and CBD. Methods Current and former workers (n=181) from a US nuclear weapons production facility, the Y-12 National Security Complex (Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA), were enrolled in a case-control study including 35 individuals with BeS and 19 with CBD. HLA-DPB1 genotypes were determined by PCR-SSP. Beryllium exposures were assessed through worker interviews and industrial hygiene assessment of work tasks. Results After removing the confounding effect of potential beryllium exposure at another facility, multivariate models showed a sixfold (OR 6.06, 95% CI 1.96 to 18.7) increased odds for BeS and CBD combined among DP beta E69 carriers and a fourfold (OR 3.98, 95% CI 1.43 to 11.0) increased odds for those exposed over an assigned lifetime-weighted average exposure of 0.1 mu g/m(3). Those with both risk factors had higher increased odds (OR 24.1, 95% CI 4.77 to 122). Conclusion DP beta E69 carriage and high exposure to beryllium appear to contribute individually to the development of BeS and CBD. Among workers at a beryllium-using facility, the magnitude of risk associated with either elevated beryllium exposure or carriage of DP beta E69 alone appears to be similar.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据