4.4 Article

Transanal endoscopic total mesorectal excision: technical aspects of approaching the mesorectal plane from below-a preliminary report

期刊

TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY
卷 19, 期 4, 页码 221-229

出版社

SPRINGER-VERLAG ITALIA SRL
DOI: 10.1007/s10151-015-1275-8

关键词

Rectal cancer; Total mesorectal excision; Transanal; Notes; Distal washout; Ballooning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) for low rectal cancer can be technically challenging. This report describes our initial experience with a hybrid laparoscopic and transanal endoscopic technique for TME in low rectal cancer. Between December 2012 and October 2013, we identified patients with rectal cancer < 5 cm from the anorectal junction (ARJ) who underwent laparoscopic-assisted TME with a transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) technique. A standardized stepwise approach was used in all patients. Resection specimens were examined for completeness and measurement of margins. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics and short-term postoperative outcomes were examined. All values are mean +/- A standard deviation. Ten patients (8 males; median age: 60.5 (range 36-70) years) were included. On initial MRI, all tumors were T2 or T3, mean tumor height from the ARJ was 28.9 +/- 12.2 mm, mean circumferential resection margin was 5.3 +/- 3.1 mm , and the mean angle between the anal canal and the levator ani was 83.9 degrees +/- 9.7 degrees. All patients had had preoperative chemoradiotherapy, TME via TAMIS, and distal anastomosis. There were no intraoperative complications, anastomotic leaks, or 30-day mortality. The pathologic quality of all mesorectal specimens was excellent. The distal resection margin was 19.4 +/- 10.4 mm, the mean circumferential resection margin was 13.8 +/- 5.1 mm, and the median lymph node harvest was 10.5 (range 5-15) nodes. A combined laparoscopic and transanal approach can achieve a safe and oncologically complete TME dissection for low rectal tumors. This approach may improve clinical outcomes in these technically difficult cases, but larger prospective studies are needed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据