4.4 Article

One-year Adjustable Intragastric Balloons: Results in 73 Consecutive Patients in the UK

期刊

OBESITY SURGERY
卷 24, 期 5, 页码 813-819

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11695-014-1176-3

关键词

Obesity; Weight loss; Intragastric balloons; Complications; Adjustable gastric balloon; Weight loss plateau; Intolerance

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Most intragastric balloons have 6-month approval. We report results with the Spatz Adjustable Balloon: approved for 12 months and adjustable. Methods Seventy-three patients (mean: age 45.5; weight 114.5 kg; BMI 36.6 kg/m(2)) scheduled for 1-year implantation with Spatz balloon (mean volume 417 ml saline). Adjustments performed for early intolerance and weight loss plateau. Results Three patients failed insertion. There were 21 early removals (4 intolerant refusing adjustment; 3 deflations; 14 satisfied patients) leaving 49 patients at 12 months. Results of 70 patients (49 patients at 12 months and 21 patients at < 12 months) were a mean 21.6 kg weight loss; 19 % weight loss; and 45.7 % EWL (excess weight loss). Ten intolerant patients were adjusted and lost additional mean 13.2 kg. Fifty-one patients with weight loss plateau scheduled for adjustment: adjustments failed in 6 and non-response in 7. The adjusted 38 patients lost an additional mean 9.4 kg and at extraction had mean 40.9 % EWL with 18.7 % weight loss. Three catheter impactions required surgical extraction, and three deflated balloons didn't migrate beyond stomach. Conclusions The Spatz balloon is an effective procedure without mortality; however, it carries a risk of catheter impaction necessitating surgical extraction (4.1 %). The failure rate-4.1 %; intolerance without ability to adjust balloon-5.5 %; major complications occurred in 3 (4.1 %); minor (balloon deflations) in 3 (4.1 %), and 2 asymptomatic gastric ulcers at extraction (2.7 %). The longer implantation period and adjustment option combine to produce greater weight loss, albeit < 10 % weight loss beyond the pre-adjustment weight loss.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据