4.4 Article

Vagal Innervation of Intestine Contributes to Weight Loss After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Surgery in Rats

期刊

OBESITY SURGERY
卷 24, 期 12, 页码 2145-2151

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11695-014-1338-3

关键词

Bariatric surgery; Vagus nerve; Rat; Adiposity; Fat preference

类别

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [DK 47348, DK 071082, DK 068036]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background It is conceivable that overstimulation of chemo-and mechano-sensors in the Roux and common limbs by uncontrolled influx of undigested nutrients after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery (RYGB) could lead to exaggerated satiety signaling via vagal afferents and contribute to body weight loss. Because previous clinical and preclinical studies using vagotomy came to different conclusions, the aim was to examine the effects of selective and histologically verified celiac branch vagotomy on reduced food intake and body weight loss induced by RYGB. Methods Male Sprague-Dawley rats underwent either RYGB + celiac branch vagotomy (RYGB/VgX, n=15), RYGB + sham celiac branch vagotomy (RYGB/Sham VgX; n=6), Sham RYGB + celiac branch vagotomy (Sham/VgX; n=6), or sham RYGB + sham celiac branch vagotomy (Sham/Sham; n=6), and body weight, body composition, and food choice were monitored for 3 months after intervention. Results In rats with RYGB, histologically confirmed celiac branch vagotomy significantly moderated weight loss during the first 40 days after surgery, compared to either sham or failed vagotomy (P<0.05). In contrast, celiac branch vagotomy slightly, but non-significantly, reduced body weight gain in sham RYGB rats compared to sham/sham rats. Furthermore, the significant food intake suppression during the first 32 days after RYGB (P<0.05) was also moderated in rats with verified celiac branch vagotomy. Conclusions The results suggest that signals carried by vagal afferents from the mid and lower intestines contribute to the early RYGB-induced body weight loss and reduction of food intake.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据