4.4 Article

Conjugated Bile Acids Associate with Altered Rates of Glucose and Lipid Oxidation after Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

期刊

OBESITY SURGERY
卷 22, 期 9, 页码 1473-1480

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11695-012-0673-5

关键词

Obesity surgery; Bile acids; Glucose and lipid oxidation; DIO2; CYP27A1

类别

资金

  1. Finnish Diabetes Research Foundation
  2. Academy of Finland [120979, 138006]
  3. EU Ideas program [ERC-2008-AdG-23118]
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation (FNS)
  5. Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne
  6. Academy of Finland (AKA) [120979] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) induces a more favorable metabolic profile than expected by weight loss alone. In this study, we investigated the effect of RYGB on serum bile acid levels and their relation to clinical outcomes. We included 30 obese patients who underwent RYGB (BMI = 46.1 +/- 5.9 kg/m(2)). Clinical measurements and laboratory determinations were performed before surgery and 1 year after surgery. Fasting serum bile acids were measured by an enzymatic method and individual bile acids were quantified by HLPC-tandem mass spectrometry. Indirect calorimetry was performed to measure the rates of energy expenditure and substrate oxidation. Fasting total serum bile acid levels increased twofold after RYGB (pre, 3.68 +/- 2.03 vs. post, 7.06 +/- 9.65 mu mol/l, +92 %, p = 0.002). This increase in total bile acids was accompanied by a decrease in conjugated bile acids, which correlated with decreased glucose oxidation (r = 0.571, p = 0.002) and with increased lipid oxidation (r = -0.626, p = 0.0004). The change in taurine-conjugated bile acids correlated with altered DIO2 mRNA expression in adipose tissue (r = -0.498, p = 0.013) potentially linking bile acid conjugation to substrate oxidation through DIO2. Fasting serum bile acid levels increase after RYGB. More specifically, changes in bile acid conjugation after RYGB associate with altered energy metabolism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据