4.4 Article

Getting the Most from the Sleeve: The Importance of Post-Operative Follow-up

期刊

OBESITY SURGERY
卷 21, 期 12, 页码 1887-1893

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11695-011-0481-3

关键词

Sleeve gastrectomy; Nutrition; Morbid obesity; Mid-term results; Bariatric surgery; Quality of life; Food tolerance

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bariatric approach to obesity provides substantial weight loss and comorbidity resolution. Our unique service includes pre- and postoperative visits to the Health and Nutrition Clinic headed by a specialist in gastroenterology and nutrition. We compared patients attending regular clinic routine with those who were lost to follow-up with regard to anthropometry, comorbidity, quality of life, and food tolerance and determined who benefited most from the operation. A retrospective review was performed on patients 30 months after undergoing sleeve gastrectomy. Body mass index was used to report weight loss. Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System (BAROS) and Food Tolerance Score were (FTS) completed by all patients at the 30-month follow-up visit and compared between two groups (group I-30 months of active postoperative follow-up; group II-without). A total of 119 patients participated in the study. For groups I and II, the mean percentage of excess BMI loss at 30 months was 82.08 +/- 9.83 and 74.88 +/- 8.75, respectively, with better comorbidity improvement in group I. BAROS scores were 7.62 +/- 0.72 and 6.92 +/- 0.92. FTS was 24.30 +/- 2.09 and 22.55 +/- 2.27, respectively. From our experience, getting the most from the sleeve is attributed to two main factors: surgery and nutrition. Surgery results in optimal restriction and improved satiety, whereas nutrition relies on a professional medical team providing constant, ongoing patient support throughout all the bariatric process stages. These teams of surgeons and gastroenterologists specializing in nutrition, working side by side, each in their area of specialty, are the main pillars leading to the success of the sleeve.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据