4.4 Article

Phylogeny and speciation in Saxifraga sect. Ciliatae (Saxifragaceae): Evidence from psbA-trnH, trnL-F and ITS sequences

期刊

TAXON
卷 64, 期 4, 页码 703-713

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.12705/644.3

关键词

chloroplast DNA; ITS; phylogeny; Qinghai-Tibet Plateau; Saxifragaceae; Saxifraga sect. Ciliatae

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [31270270, 31200281, 31400322, 31110103911]
  2. Internaltional Scientific and Technological Cooperation Projects of Qinghai Province [2014-HZ-812]
  3. National Science Infrastructure Platform Foundation of China [2013FY112100]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nearly half of the species in the large genus Saxifraga belong to Saxifraga sect. Ciliatae, a largely Sino-Himalayan taxon. We report here that evidence from chloroplast DNA sequences (psbA-trnH, trnL-F) and from nuclear sequences (ITS) indicates that this section is monophyletic and composed of at least three main lineages, corresponding to (1) a clade made up of species from S. subsect. Gemmiparae, subsect. Cinerascentes, subsect. Flagellares and subsect. Hemisphaericae, in which the last three subsections are nested in the first; (2) a clade of species belonging to S. subsect. Rosulares (including S. subsect. Serpyllifoliae); and (3) a clade of species belonging to S. subsect. Hirculoideae. Species relationships in S. subsect. Rosulares and subsect. Hirculoideae are not well resolved. A molecular clock analysis indicates that the diversification of S. sect. Ciliatae into its three lineages dates from ca. 9.48 Ma, coinciding with orogenic events associated with one of the most important phases of uplift of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Extensive diversifications within S. subsect. Rosulares and subsect. Hirculoideae have been more recent (ca. 4.51 Ma and 2.12 Ma, respectively), again correlated with Qinghai-Tibet Plateau uplift events and, in the case of S. subsect. Hirculoideae, have occurred at a rate comparable to that seen in the radiation of Hawaiian fruit flies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据