4.4 Article

Evidence for the Necessity to Systematically Assess Micronutrient Status Prior to Bariatric Surgery

期刊

OBESITY SURGERY
卷 19, 期 1, 页码 66-73

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11695-008-9545-4

关键词

Morbid obesity; Micronutrient deficiencies; Preoperative assessment

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bariatric surgery has been proven the most effective treatment of morbid obesity, but micronutrient deficiency following bariatric surgery is a major concern. Increasing evidence points to a generally poor micronutrient status in obese subjects. We assessed micronutrient status in 232 morbidly obese subjects (BMI a parts per thousand yenaEuro parts per thousand 35 kg/m(2)) prior to bariatric surgery. Serum albumin, calcium, phosphate, magnesium, ferritin, hemoglobin, zinc, folate, vitamin B-12, 25-OH vitamin D-3, and intact parathormone (iPTH) were determined. In a sub-sample of 89 subjects, we additionally assessed copper, selenium, vitamin B-1, B-3, B-6, A, and E levels. Deficiencies were found in 12.5% of the subjects for albumin, 8.0% for phosphate, 4.7% for magnesium, 6.9% for ferritin, 6.9% for hemoglobin, 24.6% for zinc, 3.4% for folate, and 18.1% for vitamin B-12. In addition, 25.4% showed a severe 25-OH vitamin D-3 deficiency, which was accompanied by a secondary hyperparathyroidism in 36.6% cases. Prevalence of albumin deficiency (p < 0.007) and of anemia (p < 0.003; in women only) significantly increased with BMI. Of note, 48.7% of the subjects showed at least one of the most prevalent deficiencies, i.e., vitamin B-12, zinc and severe 25-OH vitamin D-3 deficiency. In the sub-sample, 32.6% showed a selenium, 5.6% a vitamin B-3, 2.2% a vitamin B-6, and 2.2% a vitamin E deficiency. Copper, vitamin B-1, and vitamin A deficiency was found in none of the subjects. Data indicate a high prevalence of micronutrient deficiencies in morbidly obese subjects. Based on these results, we strongly recommend a systematic assessment of the micronutrient status in all candidates for bariatric surgery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据