4.6 Review

Monitoring foods and beverages provided and sold in public sector settings

期刊

OBESITY REVIEWS
卷 14, 期 -, 页码 96-107

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/obr.12079

关键词

Food provision; INFORMAS; public settings; schools

资金

  1. Rockefeller Foundation
  2. International Obesity Taskforce
  3. University of Auckland
  4. Deakin University
  5. George Institute, University of Sydney
  6. Queensland University of Technology
  7. University of Oxford
  8. University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine
  9. World Cancer Research Fund International
  10. University of Toronto
  11. Australian National University
  12. Faculty of Health at Deakin University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper outlines a step-wise framework for monitoring foods and beverages provided or sold in publicly funded institutions. The focus is on foods in schools, but the framework can also be applied to foods provided or sold in other publicly funded institutions. Data collection and evaluation within this monitoring framework will consist of two components. In component I, information on existing food or nutrition policies and/or programmes within settings would be compiled. Currently, nutrition standards and voluntary guidelines associated with such policies/programmes vary widely globally. This paper, which provides a comprehensive review of such standards and guidelines, will facilitate institutional learnings for those jurisdictions that have not yet established them or are undergoing review of existing ones. In component II, the quality of foods provided or sold in public sector settings is evaluated relative to existing national or sub-national nutrition standards or voluntary guidelines. Where there are no (or only poor) standards or guidelines available, the nutritional quality of foods can be evaluated relative to standards of a similar jurisdiction or other appropriate standards. Measurement indicators are proposed (within minimal', expanded' and optimal' approaches) that can be used to monitor progress over time in meeting policy objectives, and facilitate comparisons between countries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据