4.6 Review

Power of metabolomics in biomarker discovery and mining mechanisms of obesity

期刊

OBESITY REVIEWS
卷 14, 期 4, 页码 344-349

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/obr.12011

关键词

Biomarkers; early diagnosis; metabolites; metabolomics; obesity

资金

  1. Key Program of the Natural Science Foundation of the State [90709019]
  2. National Specific Program on the Subject of Public Welfare [200807014]
  3. National Program for Key Basic Research Projects in China [2005CB523406]
  4. National Key Program on the Subject of Drug Innovation [2009ZX09502-005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Obesity, the prevalence of which is increasing rapidly worldwide, is recognized as a risk factor for diabetes, cardiovascular disease, liver disease and renal disease. Unfortunately, the mechanisms underlying it have not been well characterized. Fortunately, metabolomics the systematic study of metabolites, which are small molecules generated by the process of metabolism has been important in elucidating the pathways underlying obesity. Small-molecule metabolites have an important role in biological system and represent attractive candidates to understand obesity phenotypes. Metabolomic analysis is a valid and powerful tool with which to further define the mechanisms. Recent attention has focused on identifying biomarkers that would propose a better non-invasive way to detect or visualize obesity and prevent its events. The discovery of the biomarkers has become a key breakthrough towards a better molecular understanding of obesity. Thus, this review covers how recent metabolomic studies have advanced biomarker discovery and the elucidation of mechanisms underlying obesity and its comorbidities. The importance of identifying metabolic markers and pathways of disease-associated intermediate phenotypes is also emphasized. These biomarkers would be applicable as diagnostic tools in a personalized healthcare setting and may also open door to biomarker discovery, disease diagnosis and novel therapeutic avenues.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据