4.6 Review

Obesity: lessons from evolution and the environment

期刊

OBESITY REVIEWS
卷 13, 期 10, 页码 910-922

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2012.01007.x

关键词

Comparative ecology and physiology; energy storage; perinatal programming; stock conference

资金

  1. Medical Research Council [MC_U106188470] Funding Source: Medline
  2. MRC [MC_U106188470] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Medical Research Council [MC_U106188470] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences
  5. Div Of Biological Infrastructure [1300426] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The 9th Stock Conference acknowledged the complex background of genetic, cultural, environmental and evolutionary factors of obesity. Geneenvironment interactions underlie the flexibility in body-weight and body-fat regulation, illustrated by the hunter-gatherers' feast and famine lifestyle, the variation in physical activity over the lifespan being highest at reproductive age, the variation in energy intake through eating in the absence of hunger, while running the risk of exceeding the capacity of triacylglyceride storage, leading to lipotoxicity and metabolic problems. Perinatal metabolic programming for obesity via epigenetic changes in response to a Western diet results in production of lipid-poor milk and metabolically efficient pups, contributing to the perpetuation of obesity throughout generations. Evolutionary insight from comparative physiology and ecology indicates that over generations activity-induced energy expenditure has remained the same compared to wild mammals, that energy balance might be dependant on protein balance, while the function of taste changed from detection of poison or energy to social drinking and social behaviour. At present, the impact of assortative mating on obesity prevalence is unambiguously positive. The complexity that appeared can only be fully appreciated by setting the data into the context of our evolutionary history.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据