4.3 Article

Fenofibrate ameliorates insulin resistance, hypertension and novel oxidative stress markers in patients with metabolic syndrome

期刊

OBESITY RESEARCH & CLINICAL PRACTICE
卷 5, 期 4, 页码 E335-E340

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.orcp.2011.03.012

关键词

Fenofibrate; Metabolic syndrome; Insulin resistance; Hypertension; Oxidative stress

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The benefits of fenofibrate, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha agonist, against cardiovascular risk factors have been established. To clarify the underlying mechanisms of these benefits, we examined the effects of fenofibrate on insulin resistance, hypertension, inflammation, oxidative stress and coagulation markers in patients with metabolic syndrome. Methods: Eleven Japanese patients with metabolic syndrome underwent physical examinations and blood tests before and after treatment with fenofibrate 200 mg daily for 8 weeks. Results: Fenofibrate significantly decreased systolic blood pressure, pulse wave velocity, serum insulin, insulin resistance (calculated from the homeostasis model assessment), total cholesterol, triglyceride, remnant-like particles cholesterol, uric acid, D-dimer, fibrinogen, serum amyloid A/low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and apoA1/LDL levels. It also significantly increased levels of high molecular weight adiponectin, thrombomodulin and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in these patients. Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, C-reactive protein, fasting plasma glucose and thrombin-antithrombin complex levels did not change. Limitation: Small sample size. Conclusion: Short-term fenofibrate administration not only improved lipid profiles, but also ameliorated insulin resistance, hypertension and oxidative stress markers in patients with metabolic syndrome, suggesting that fenofibrate can decrease the risk of arteriosclerosis through various pathways. (C) 2011 Asian Oceanian Association for the Study of Obesity. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据