4.3 Article

Projected future trends of hospital service use for selected obesity-related conditions

期刊

OBESITY RESEARCH & CLINICAL PRACTICE
卷 2, 期 2, 页码 133-141

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.orcp.2008.03.006

关键词

Health service use; Diabetes; Obstructive sleep apnoea; Bariatric surgery; Total knee replacements; Modeling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The duet problems of obesity and the aging of society are likely to produce substantially increased demand on health services in the future. We examine the projected burden which four obesity-related conditions potentially can place on the hospital system in Australia: diabetes, obstructive steep apnoea (OSA), knee replacements, and bariatric surgery. Methods: Separations for each condition were obtained from the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) data from 1990 to 2005. Projections of age specific rates for each condition/procedure to 2020 by sex and 5-year age groups developed using double exponential smoothing were applied to population projections to estimate numbers of separations or procedures. Results: Large, significant increases in rates per 100,000 population for each condition/procedure occurred from 1990 to 2005 for each gender and across all adult age groups. Numbers of separations for diabetes are estimated to increase from 50,258 in 2005 to 180,057 in 2020 and for OSA from 32,262 to 83,535. Procedures for total knee replacements are projected to increase from 28,490 in 2005 to 67,619 in 2020 and for bariatric surgery from 32,262 to 83,535. Conclusion: The combined effects of demographic change with a rapidly aging population along with a high and increasing prevalence of obesity will continue to drive the four conditions/procedures studied and this will have a considerable effect on health resources. The consequences of not acting, or acting ineffectively, are high and constitute a serious threat to future public health. (C) 2008 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Asian Oceanian Association for the Study of Obesity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据