4.3 Article

Food Insecurity, a Determinant of Obesity? - an Analysis from a Population-Based Survey in the Paris Metropolitan Area, 2010

期刊

OBESITY FACTS
卷 7, 期 2, 页码 120-129

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000362343

关键词

-

资金

  1. French National Research Agency (ANR)
  2. French Institute for Public Health Research (IRESP)
  3. French Interministerial Committee for Urban Affairs
  4. Mutualite Francaise
  5. Ile-de-France region

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective The relationship between food insecurity and obesity is discussed in the literature. The objective of this study was to determine whether food insecurity and obesity were associated in the Paris metropolitan area. Methods : We used data from third wave of the Health, Inequalities and Social Ruptures (SIRS) cohort study, a longitudinal population-based, representative health and socioepidemiological survey of the general population in the Paris metropolitan area. The participants' BMI (calculated using self-reported height and weight) was analyzed as a continuous variable, and a dichotomous variable (BMI < 30 kg/m(2)/BMI >= 30 kg/m(2)) was constructed. Food insecurity was estimated using the Household Food Security Scale Module (HFSSM) and was treated as a trichotomous variable (food security/low food security /very low food security). Multilevel models were estimated for men and women separately. Results: Obesity (BMI >= 30 kg/m(2)) prevalence was 10.2%. The determinant of obesity differs according to gender. After adjustment for age, income and the sociooccupational group, very low food security was associated with obesity in women (OR = 2.01, 95% CI 1.053.82), and women with very low food security had a higher BMI (Coef. = 1.78, 95% CI 0.243.31). This association, however, was not significant for men (OR = 1.84, 95% CI 0.64-5.30). Conclusion: In times of economic crisis, it is increasingly essential to explore and understand the pathway through which very low food security is linked to obesity. (C) 2014 S. Karger GmbH, Freiburg

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据