4.3 Article

Sleeping Habits Predict the Magnitude of Fat Loss in Adults Exposed to Moderate Caloric Restriction

期刊

OBESITY FACTS
卷 5, 期 4, 页码 561-566

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000342054

关键词

Adiposity; Diet; Obesity; Sleep; Weight loss

资金

  1. Wyeth Consumer Healthcare Inc.
  2. Dairy Farmers of Canada
  3. US National Dairy Council
  4. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  5. Canada Research Chair in Environment and Energy Balance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To verify whether sleep quantity and quality at baseline predict the magnitude of fat loss in adults subjected to moderate caloric restriction. Methods: A total of 123 overweight and obese men and women (age, 41.1 +/- 6.0 years; BMI, 33.2 +/- 3.6 kg/m(2) (mean +/- SD)) underwent a weight loss intervention consisting of a targeted 600-700 kcal/day decrease in energy intake supervised by a dietician. The length of the intervention varied between 15 and 24 weeks. Body fat mass (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry), sleep quality (total Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index score) and sleep duration (h/night, self-reported from the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index) were assessed at both baseline and at the end of the weight loss program. Results: The mean weight loss over the dietary intervention was 4.5 +/- 3.9 kg, 76% of which came from fat stores. Using a multiple linear regression analysis, we observed a significant positive relationship between sleep duration and the loss of body fat, both in absolute (adjusted beta = 0.72 kg/h; p < 0.05) as well as in relative terms (adjusted beta = 0.77%/h; p < 0.01), after adjusting for age, sex, baseline BMI, length of the intervention, and change in total energy intake. Furthermore, we observed that a better sleep quality at baseline was associated with greater fat mass loss. Conclusion: This study provides evidence that sleeping habits can influence the success of a weight loss intervention and should be taken into consideration when one decides to start a diet. Copyright (c) 2012 S. Karger GmbH, Freiburg

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据