4.7 Article

Epicardial Adipose Tissue Assessed by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Heart Failure Due to Dilated Cardiomyopathy

期刊

OBESITY
卷 21, 期 3, 页码 E253-E261

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/oby.20149

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: We sought to investigate the association of the EAT with CMR parameters of ventricular remodelling and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction in patients with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Design and Methods: One hundred and fifty subjects (112 consecutive patients with DCM and 48 healthy controls) underwent CMR examination. Function, volumes, dimensions, the LV remodelling index (LVRI), the presence of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and the amount of EAT were assessed. Results: Compared to healthy controls, patients with DCM revealed a significantly reduced indexed EAT mass (31.7 +/- 5.6 g/m(2) vs 24.0 +/- 7.5 g/m(2), p<0.0001). There was no difference in the EAT mass between DCM patients with moderate and severe LV dysfunction (23.5 +/- 9.8 g/m(2) vs 24.2 +/- 6.6 g/m(2), P = 0.7). Linear regression analysis in DCM patients showed that with increasing LV end-diastolic mass index (LV-EDMI) (r = 0.417, P < 0.0001), increasing LV end-diastolic volume index (r = 0.251, P = 0.01) and increasing LV end-diastolic diameter (r = 0.220, P = 0.02), there was also a significantly increased amount of EAT mass. However, there was no correlation between the EAT and the LV ejection fraction (r = 0.0085, P = 0.37), right ventricular ejection fraction (r = 0.049, P = 0.6), LVRI (r = 0.116, P = 0.2) and the extent of LGE % (r = 0.189, P = 0.1). Among the healthy controls, the amount of EAT only correlated with increasing age (r = 0.461, P = 0.001), BMI (r = 0.426, P = 0.003) and LV-EDMI (r = 0.346, P = 0.02). Conclusion: In patients with DCM the amount of EAT is decreased compared to healthy controls irrespective of LV function impairment. However, an increase in LV mass and volumes is associated with a significantly increase in EAT in patients with DCM.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据