4.7 Article

Urinary F2-Isoprostanes, Obesity, and Weight Gain in the IRAS Cohort

期刊

OBESITY
卷 20, 期 9, 页码 1915-1921

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1038/oby.2011.292

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [1R01DK081028]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Obesity has been associated with increased F-2-isoprostane (F-2-IsoP) levels cross-sectionally. However, the prospective association may be inverse, based on our earlier finding that elevated urinary F-2-IsoP levels predict lower risk of diabetes. This earlier finding led us to hypothesize that urinary F-2-IsoPs reflect the intensity of oxidative metabolism and as such predict lower risk of both diabetes and weight gain. We examined cross-sectional relationships with obesity and prospective relationships with weight gain using the data from 299 participants of the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study (IRAS), all of whom were free of diabetes at baseline. Four urinary F-2-IsoPs were assayed in stored baseline urine samples using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry: iPF(2 alpha)-III, 2,3-dinor-iPF(2 alpha)-III, iPF(2 alpha)-VI, and 8,12-iso-iPF(2 alpha)-VI (F-2-IsoP 1-4, respectively). Baseline F-2-IsoPs were positively associated with baseline measures of obesity; the strongest associations were found with two F-2-IsoPs: odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) for overall and abdominal obesity were 1.74 (1.26-2.40) and 1.63 (1.18-2.24) for F-2-IsoP2 and 1.47 (1.12-1.94) and 1.64 (1.22-2.20) for F-2-IsoP4. F-2-IsoP2 showed the strongest and significant inverse association with weight gain during the 5-year follow-up period: increase in F-2-IsoP2 equal to 1 s.d. was associated with 0.90 kg lower weight gain (P = 0.02) and the odds ratios for relative (>= 5%) and absolute (>= 5kg) weight gain were 0.67 (0.47-0.96) and 0.57 (0.37-0.87), respectively. The other three F-2-IsoPs were consistently inversely associated with weight gain, although not significantly, suggesting that different F-2-IsoPs vary in their ability to detect the association with weight gain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据