4.7 Article

Bypassing the Duodenum Does Not Improve Insulin Resistance Associated With Diet-Induced Obesity in Rodents

期刊

OBESITY
卷 19, 期 2, 页码 380-387

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1038/oby.2010.263

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [DK082205, DK076928, DK056863]
  2. Amylin Pharmaceuticals
  3. Eli Lilly
  4. Johnson Johnson
  5. Novo Nordisk
  6. Zafgen Inc.
  7. Merck
  8. Roche
  9. Mannkind
  10. Ethicon

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Roux-en-y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery rapidly improves glucose tolerance and reverses insulin resistance in obese patients. It has been hypothesized that this effect is mediated by the diversion of nutrients from the proximal small intestine. We utilized duodenal-jejunal bypass (DJB) as a modification of gastric bypass to determine the effect of nutrient diversion from the foregut without gastric restriction on insulin resistance in obese rats. The effects of DJB or Sham surgery on glucose homeostasis were determined in both high-fat-fed Long-Evans and Wistar rats. Body weight and food intake were measured weekly postoperatively, and body composition was monitored before and after surgery. Glucose tolerance was tested before and as early as 1 month postoperation; additionally, in Wistar rats, insulin sensitivity was determined by a hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp (HIEC). DJB did not affect body weight, body composition, glucose tolerance, or insulin concentrations over the period of the study. The average glucose infusion rate (GIR) during the HIEC was 6.2 +/- 1.16 mg/kg/min for Sham rats compared to 7.2 +/- 1.71 mg/kg/min for DJB rats (P = 0.62), and neither endogenous glucose production (EGP; P = 0.81) nor glucose utilization (glucose disappearance (R-d), P = 0.59) differed between DJB and Sham rats. DJB does not affect insulin resistance induced by a high-fat diet in Long-Evans and Wistar rats. These data suggest that duodenal bypass alone is an insufficient mechanism to alter insulin sensitivity independent of weight loss in obese, nondiabetic rodents.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据