4.7 Article

Glucose-dependent Insulinotropic Polypeptide (GIP) Stimulates Transepithelial Glucose Transport

期刊

OBESITY
卷 16, 期 11, 页码 2412-2416

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/oby.2008.393

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [K08DK002410, R01-DK53158, R01-DK059529]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this study was to characterize the effects of glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) on small intestinal glucose transport in vitro. Stripped proximal jejunum from fasted mice was mounted in Ussing chambers. The serosal side was bathed in Regular Ringer solution containing 5 mmol/l glucose, and the mucosal side, with solution containing 10 mmol/l 3-O-methyl glucose (3OMG). Intercellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP), mucosa-to-serosa fluxes of 3OMG (J(ms)(3OMG)), and short-circuit current (I-SC) were measured in the presence and absence of GIP. GIP increased cAMP by 2.5-fold in isolated enterocytes, consistent with a direct effect of GIP on these epithelial cells. GIP also increased I-SC and J(ms)(3OMG) by 68 and 53%, respectively, indicating that the increase in J(ms)(3OMG) was primarily electrogenic, with a small electroneutral component. The stimulatory effect of GIP on J(ms)(3OMG) was concentration dependent. In addition, 1,000 nmol/l and 10 nmol/l GIP increased J(ms)(3OMG) by 70 and 30% over control, respectively, consistent with receptor activation. Phlorizin (20 mu mol/l), an inhibitor of Na+-glucose cotransporter (SGLT-1), abolished the increase in I-SC and decreased J(ms)(3OMG) by similar to 65%. These results indicate that stimulation of SGLT-1 activity by GIP partially accounts for the increase in J(ms)(30MG). These studies are the first to demonstrate direct stimulation of intestinal glucose transport by GIP independent of its insulinotropic properties. GIP stimulates cellular accumulation of cAMP and thereby upregulates glucose transport. The GIP-induced increase in glucose transport appears to be mediated, at least in part, by SGLT-1.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据