4.7 Article

Ability to taste 6-n-propylthiouracil and BMI in low-income preschool-aged children

期刊

OBESITY
卷 16, 期 7, 页码 1522-1528

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1038/oby.2008.227

关键词

-

资金

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [K23 HD054657-01, K23 HD054657] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Sensitivity to the bitter compound 6-n-propylthiouracil ( PROP) is genetically mediated. Sensitivity to PROP has been associated with weight status in both adults and children. Objective: To determine whether there is an association between PROP sensitivity and BMI in low-income children of diverse race/ethnicity, among whom there is a high prevalence of obesity. Methods and Procedures: Eighty-one preschool-aged children attending Head Start tasted a solution of 560 mu mol/l PROP and reported whether it tasted like water or like something else. Mothers reported child's race, age, maternal education, maternal weight and height, child's reluctance to sample new foods via the Food Neophobia Scale (FNS), and child's dietary intake using a food frequency questionnaire. Child weight and height were measured. BMI was calculated and for children, expressed in z-scores. Regression analyses were used to evaluate the relationship between child's PROP taster status and BMI z-score, testing covariates child's age, gender, race, maternal education and BMI, and child's FNS score. Children's dietary intake was compared by PROP taster status. Results: PROP tasters, compared with nontasters, had significantly higher BMI z-scores (0.99 (s.d. 1.24) vs. 0.03 (1.12), P = 0.004) and had a significantly higher prevalence of overweight (31.8% vs. 5.6%, P = 0.025), but demonstrated no differences in reported dietary intake. The most parsimonious model predicting the child's BMI z-score included only maternal BMI and the child's PROP taster status (R-2 = 22.3%). Discussion: A genetically mediated ability to taste bitter may contribute to obesity risk in low-income, preschool-aged children.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据