4.4 Review

A natural solution for obesity: Bioactives for the prevention and treatment of weight gain. A review

期刊

NUTRITIONAL NEUROSCIENCE
卷 18, 期 2, 页码 49-65

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1179/1476830513Y.0000000099

关键词

Obesity; Natural bioactives; Food intake; Appetite

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: Obesity and obesity-related disorders are reaching epidemic proportions worldwide. In this review, we summarize the accumulating studies that have emerged in the last few decades demonstrating that bioactives from different natural sources could potentially have anti-obesity effects. Methods: We carried out an extensive search of relevant literature from Pubmed, Web of Knowledge, and other online databases for studies where anti-obesity effects were shown by compounds from natural sources. Results: Appetite suppression, lipid metabolism regulation, and increase of energy expenditure are the main mechanisms by which anti-obesity effects are exerted. Plants represent the most studied natural source of anti-obesity bioactives. Camellia sinensis is the most representative species exerting several anti-obesity effects. Moreover, probiotics (bacteria which bestow health benefit), such as strains of Bifidobacteria and Lactobacillus families, and certain prebiotics (non-viable food components that confers a health benefit on the host associated with modulation of the microbiota effects), such as insulin-type fructans, have also shown capability to combat obesity. Finally, compounds from animal sources, in particular bioactive peptides derived from milk-derived whey and casein protein digestion, high dietary calcium, and omega-3s polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 PUFA) present in fish oils, have also shown potential anti-obesity effects. Discussion: Several anti-obesity effects have been observed in different natural bioactives providing an interesting and potentially safer and more desirable treatment strategy for the development of anti-obesity functional or medical foods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据