4.4 Review

The Maillard reaction and pet food processing: effects on nutritive value and pet health

期刊

NUTRITION RESEARCH REVIEWS
卷 26, 期 2, 页码 130-148

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0954422413000103

关键词

Extrusion; Advanced glycation endproducts; Reactive lysine; Dogs; Cats

资金

  1. European Union
  2. European Regional Development Fund
  3. Ministry of Economic Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation
  4. Peaks in the Delta
  5. Municipality of Groningen
  6. Province of Groningen
  7. MARS Petcare
  8. Dutch Carbohydrate Competence Center [CCC WP 5]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Maillard reaction, which can occur during heat processing of pet foods or ingredients, is known to reduce the bioavailability of essential amino acids such as lysine due to the formation of early and advanced Maillard reaction products (MRP) that are unavailable for utilisation by the body. Determination of the difference between total and reactive lysine by chemical methods provides an indication of the amount of early MRP present in foods, feeds and ingredients. Previous research reported that the difference between total and reactive lysine in pet foods can be up to 61.8%, and foods for growing dogs may be at risk of supplying less lysine than the animal may require. The endogenous analogues of advanced MRP, advanced glycation endproducts, have been associated with age-related diseases in humans, such as diabetes and impaired renal function. It is unknown to what extent advanced MRP are present in pet foods, and if dietary MRP can be associated with the development of diseases such as diabetes and impaired renal function in pet animals. Avoidance of ingredients with high levels of MRP and processing conditions known to favour the Maillard reaction may be useful strategies to prevent the formation of MRP in manufactured pet food. Future work should further focus on understanding the effects of ingredient choice and processing conditions on the formation of early and advanced MRP, and possible effects on animal health.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据