4.5 Article

Grape skin extract reduces adipogenesis- and lipogenesis-related gene expression in 3T3-L1 adipocytes through the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ signaling pathway

期刊

NUTRITION RESEARCH
卷 32, 期 7, 页码 514-521

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.nutres.2012.06.001

关键词

Adipocyte; Lipid accumulation; Grape skin; Nutragenomics; Antiobesity; Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-gamma

资金

  1. Ministry of Knowledge Economy of the Republic of Korea [70004935]
  2. Korea Institute of Industrial Technology(KITECH) [70004935] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We previously reported that grape skin ethanol extract (GSE) decreases adipogenic transcription factor gene expression, inhibiting triglyceride accumulation in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. In this study, we hypothesized that GSE may induce differential expression profiles in adipocytes, thus providing protection against obesity. Thirty-five genes involved in the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPAR gamma) signaling pathway, lipid metabolism, or adipogenesis were identified through microarray analysis of adipocytes treated with GSE. Expression of the genes involved in PPAR gamma signaling, Adipoq, Scd1, Nr1h3, Fabp5, Scd2, and Pparg decreased with GSE treatment, whereas expression of Ppargc1a increased. Lipid metabolism-associated genes Mlxp1, Stat5a, Hsl, Plin1, and Vdr were down-regulated. Interestingly, GSE also affected expression of genes related to the mitogen-activated protein kinases pathway. GSE extract treatment decreased expression of aP2, Fas, and Tnfa, known markers of adipogenesis, as measured by real-time polymerase reaction. These findings demonstrate the antiadipogenic effects of GSE on 3T3-L1 adipocytes at the genetic level, primarily on the PPAR gamma signaling pathway. Crown Copyright (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据