4.5 Article

Epicardial fat thickness significantly decreases after short-term growth hormone (GH) replacement therapy in adults with GH deficiency

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.numecd.2011.09.001

关键词

Epicardial adipose tissue; Epicardial fat; Epicardial fat thickness; GH deficiency rhGH therapy

资金

  1. AIRC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Aim: Growth Hormone Deficiency (GHD) is characterized by increased visceral fat accumulation. Echocardiographic epicardial fat thickness is a new marker of visceral adiposity. Aim of the present study was to evaluate whether epicardial fat thickness can significantly change and therefore serve as a marker of visceral fat reduction after short- term rhGH replacement therapy in patients with adult-onset GHD. Methods and Results: Echocardiographic epicardial fat thickness was measured in 18 patients (10 M, 8 F, age 48 +/- 11.8 yrs, BMI 29 5.9 kg/m(2)) with adult- onset GHD, at baseline and after 6 and 12 months of rhGH therapy and in 18 healthy matched controls, at baseline. Echocardiographic epicardial fat thickness, conventional anthropometric and metabolic parameters, body fat percentage and quality of life were also evaluated. Epicardial fat thickness in adult GHD patients was higher than in controls (9.8 +/- 2.8 vs 8 +/- 3 mm, p < 0.05). Epicardial fat thickness significantly decreased after 6- months of rhGH replacement therapy (from 9.8 +/- 2.8 to 7.0 2.3 mm, P < 0.01, i.e. +/- 29% from baseline). After 12 months of rhGH replacement therapy, epicardial fat thickness showed a further significant decrease (from 7.0 +/- 2.3 to 5.9 +/- 3.1 mm, P < 0.01, i.e. +/- 40% from baseline). No significant changes in BMI or waist circumference after 6 or 12 months of rhGH therapy were observed. Conclusions: Echocardiographic epicardial fat thickness may represent a valuable and easy marker of visceral fat and visceral fat changes during rhGH replacement treatment in patients with adult-onset growth hormone deficiency. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据