4.5 Article

Dietary patterns, cardiovascular risk factors and C-reactive protein in a healthy Italian population

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.numecd.2008.11.009

关键词

Dietary patterns; Principal factor analysis; Reduced rank regression; Cardiovascular risk factors; C-reactive protein

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and aims: Dietary habits have been associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors. This study aimed at evaluating the association of non-predefined dietary patterns with CVD risk profile and C-reactive protein (CRP). Methods and results: We analyzed 7646 healthy subjects from the Moti-sani project, an on-going cross-sectional cohort study of men and women aged >= 35, randomly recruited from a general Italian population. The Italian EPIC food frequency questionnaire was used. Food patterns were generated using principal factor analysis (PFA) and reduced rank regression (RRR). Three dietary patterns were identified by PFA. The Olive Oil and Vegetables pattern, characterized by high intake of olive oil, vegetables, legumes, soups, fruits and fish, was associated with relatively lower values of glucose, lipids, CRP, blood pressure and individual global CVD risk score. The Pasta and Meat pattern, characterized by high intake of pasta, tomato sauce, red meat, animal fats and alcohol, was positively associated with glucose, lipids, CRP and CVD risk score. The Eggs and Sweets pattern, characterized by positive loadings of eggs, processed meat, margarines, butter, sugar and sweets, was associated with high values of CRP. The first RRR pattern was similar to the Pasta and Meat pattern both in composition and association with CVD risk profile. Conclusions: In a large healthy Italian population, non-predefined dietary patterns including foods considered to be rather unhealthy, were associated with higher levels of cardiovascular risk factors, CRP and individual global CVD risk, whereas a prudent-healthy pattern was associated with tower levels. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据