4.3 Article

Cat's Whiskers Tea (Orthosiphon Stamineus) Extract Inhibits Growth of Colon Tumor in Nude Mice and Angiogenesis in Endothelial Cells via Suppressing VEGFR Phosphorylation

期刊

出版社

LAWRENCE ERLBAUM ASSOC INC-TAYLOR & FRANCIS
DOI: 10.1080/01635581.2012.630160

关键词

-

资金

  1. Universiti Sains Malaysia [1001/PPSK/8120243]
  2. RU
  3. Malaysian Ministry of Higher Education [FRGS: 203/PFARMASI/671196]
  4. MAKNA [304/PFARMASI/650547/M122]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cat's whiskers (Orthosiphon stamineus) is commonly used as Java tea to treat kidney stones including a variety of angiogenesis-dependent diseases such as tumorous edema, rheumatism, diabetic blindness, and obesity. In the present study, antitumor potential of standardized 50% ethanol extract of O. stamineus leaves (EOS) was evaluated against colorectal tumor in athymic mice and antiangiogenic efficacy of EOS was investigated in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC). EOS at 100 mg/kg caused 47.62 +/- 6.4% suppression in tumor growth, while at 200 mg/kg it caused 83.39 +/- 4.1% tumor regression. Tumor histology revealed significant reduction in extent of vascularization. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay showed EOS (200 mg/kg) significantly reduced the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) level in vitro (211 +/- 0.26 pg/ml cell lysate) as well as in vivo (90.9 +/- 2 pg/g tissue homogenate) when compared to the control (378 +/- 5 and 135.5 +/- 4 pg, respectively). However, EOS was found to be noncytotoxic to colon cancer and endothelial cells. In vitro, EOS significantly inhibited the migration and tube formation of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). EOS suppressed VEGF-induced phosphorylation of VEGF receptor-2 in HUVECs. High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis of EOS showed high rosmarinic acid contents, whereas phytochemical analysis revealed high protein and phenolic contents. These results demonstrated that the antitumor activity of EOS may be due to its VEGF-targeted antiangiogenicity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据