4.3 Article Proceedings Paper

Elevated Plasma gamma-Tocopherol and Decreased alpha-Tocopherol in Men Are Associated With Inflammatory Markers and Decreased Plasma 25-OH Vitamin D

期刊

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01635580802404162

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA063464-09, R37 CA054281, R01 CA063464, P01 CA033619, P01 CA033619-20, R37 CA054281-15] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA063464, P01CA033619, R37CA054281] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chronic inflammation is a risk factor for many diseases of aging. Endogenous oxidants are thought to mediate the effects of inflammation and gamma-Tocopherol (gamma-Toc) may mitigate damage from nitrogen-based oxidants; however, no physiological requirement for gamma-Toc has been established. Regulation of tocopherols and their functional significance are poorly defined, thereby limiting their application in prevention. Using stored plasma samples from 657 male control subjects in a previous study of prostate cancer, we have analyzed associations of the tocopherols, inflammation markers, and 25-hydroxy (OH) vitamin D. Plasma a-Toe and gamma-Toc were inversely correlated, whereas delta-Toc and alpha-Toc levels were positively correlated, suggesting a unique regulatory mechanism. gamma-Toc levels were positively and a-Toc negatively associated with plasma C-reactive protein (CRP) and urinary isoprostane F-2t, which are markers of inflammation and oxidation. Ethnic variability in tocopherols was observed; however, this may be explained by differences in plasma 25-OH vitamin D, as gamma-Toc levels varied inversely and alpha-Toc positively with 25-OH vitamin D. In these data, all-cause mortality appeared to be positively associated with CRP and inversely with 25-OH vitamin D. We hypothesize that plasma levels of tocopherols may serve as markers of systemic inflammation, complicating epidemiologic assessment of their role in cancer etiology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据