4.5 Article

Regulation of an antioxidant blend on intestinal redox status and major microbiota in early weaned piglets

期刊

NUTRITION
卷 30, 期 5, 页码 584-589

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.nut.2013.10.018

关键词

Antioxidant; Redox status; Microbiota; Intestine; Weaned; Piglets

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30972103]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: According to the antioxidants network theory, the present study was conducted to evaluate the regulation of an antioxidant blend on intestinal redox status and major microbiota of early-weaned piglets. Methods: Piglets from 15 litters were randomly allocated by litter to the control group (suckling normally, fed the basal diet, n = 5), the weaning group (weaned at age 21 d, fed the basal diet, n = 5), and the repair group (weaned at age 21 d, fed the basal diet supplemented with an antioxidant blend, n = 5). The redox status and major microbiota in jejunum and colon tracts of 24-d-old piglets were detected, respectively. Results: Early weaning resulted in significant decreases in jejunum and colon antioxidant capacities, Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium counts, and significant increases in levels of jejunum malondialdehyde, colon hydroxyl radicals, jejunum and colon H2O2, and Escherichia coli counts in piglets. The observed imbalance of the intestinal redox status and microbiota was significantly restored by the antioxidant blend. Interestingly, intestinal selected antioxidative items presented a positive correlation with potential beneficial bacteria and a negative correlation with E cob. Nevertheless, selected oxidative items and the bacteria presented an inverse relationship in piglets. Conclusion: Supplementation of the antioxidant blend effectively restored intestinal redox status and microbiota balance in the porcine intestine in response to early weaning stress, enhancing intestinal health and function of piglets. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据