4.5 Article

Low-dose creatine supplementation enhances fatigue resistance in the absence of weight gain

期刊

NUTRITION
卷 27, 期 4, 页码 451-455

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.nut.2010.04.001

关键词

Ergogenic aid; Monohydrate; Isokinetic; Phosphocreatine; Dietary supplement

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: We examined the effects of 6 wk of low-dose creatine supplementation on body composition, muscle function, and body creatine retention. Methods: Twenty healthy men and women (21 +/- 2 y old) were randomized to receive creatine (0.03 g . kg(-1) . d(-1); n = 10, 4 women) or placebo (n = 10, 4 women) for 6 wk in a double-blind placebo-controlled fashion. Participants were tested on two occasions before supplementation to establish a reliable baseline, and then were retested after supplementation. Testing included body composition, maximal strength (three-repetition maximal concentric knee extension at 180 degrees/s), muscle fatigue (five sets of 30 concentric knee extensions at 180 degrees/s), and plasma creatine concentration. Results: There were no significant differences in body mass, fat-free mass, fat mass, body fat percentage, total body water, or maximal strength in either group from before to after supplementation (all P > 0.05). After supplementation, plasma creatine increased significantly in the creatine group (+182%, P = 0.03), with no difference in the placebo group. Compared with baseline values, creatine-supplemented volunteers were more resistant to fatigue during sets 2 (7%), 3 (9%), 4 (9%), and 5 (11%) (all P < 0.05). In placebo-supplemented participants, there was no improvement in fatigue resistance during sets 2 (0%); 3 (1%), 4 (0%), and 5 (-1%) (all P> 0.05). Conclusion: Ingesting a low dose (approximate to 2.3 g/d) of creatine for 6 wk significantly increased plasma creatine concentration and enhanced resistance to fatigue during repeated bouts of high-intensity contractions. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据