4.5 Article

The ω-3 and ω-6 fats in meals: A proposal for a simple new label

期刊

NUTRITION
卷 27, 期 6, 页码 719-726

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.nut.2010.07.019

关键词

Dietary fats; Food analysis; Lipid metabolism; omega-3 Fatty acids; omega-6 Fatty acids

资金

  1. Australian Research Council
  2. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The omega-3 and omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) are separate essential dietary fatty acids that play a key role in many physiologic processes in higher animals. The content of these PUFAs is relatively well described for many individual food components. Our goal in this study was to analyze the PUFA content of whole meals and produce a simple measurement to estimate the intake of these fatty acids. Methods: The fatty acid profile and macronutrient composition were determined for a range of fast food, cuisine (restaurant-prepared), and home-prepared whole meals commonly consumed by Australians. Results: Across the different meals there was significant variation in protein (4-fold), fat (13-fold), and carbohydrate (23-fold) contents. With regard to the fatty acid profile, saturated and mono-unsaturated fatty acids made up approximately 80% of total fatty acids for most meals. The omega-6 PUFAs were substantially more abundant than omega-3 PUFAs for most meals. The balance of dietary omega-3 and omega-6 PUFAs is an important determinant of their metabolic effects within the body, and accordingly we calculated the percentage of the total PUFA comprised of omega-3 PUFAs and referred to this as the PUFA Balance. This parameter showed the greatest variation among the different meals (>45-fold). Conclusion: The relative proportions of omega-3 and omega-6 PUFAs vary greatly across meals. PUFA Balance is a useful tool that will allow individuals to more easily monitor and balance their intake of omega-3 and omega-6 fats. Crown Copyright (C) 2011 Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据