4.4 Article

Nitrogen availability to maize as affected by fertilizer application and soil type in the Tanzanian highlands

期刊

NUTRIENT CYCLING IN AGROECOSYSTEMS
卷 112, 期 2, 页码 197-213

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10705-018-9939-1

关键词

Seasonal variation; N leaching; N retention; Plant N uptake; Maize yield; Sub-Saharan Africa

资金

  1. Inter-Graduate School Program for Sustainable Development and Survivable Societies at Kyoto University
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI [24228007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Enhancing crop production by maintaining a proper synchrony between soil nitrogen (N) and crop N demand remains a challenge, especially in under-studied tropical soils of Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). For two consecutive cropping seasons (2013-2015), we monitored the fluctuation of soil inorganic N and its availability to maize in the Tanzanian highlands. Different urea-N rates (0-150kgN ha(-1); split into two dressings) were applied to two soil types (TZi, sandy Alfisols; and TZm, clayey Andisols). In the early growing season, soil mineralized N was exposed to the leaching risk due to small crop N demand. In the second N application (major N supply accounting for two-thirds of the total N), applied urea was more efficient in increasing soil inorganic N availability at TZm than at TZi. Such effect of soil type could be the main contributor to the higher yield at TZm (up to 4.4Mgha(-1)) than that at TZi (up to 2.6Mgha(-1)) under the same N rate. The best-fitted linear-plateau model indicated that the soil inorganic N availability (0-0.3m) at the tasseling stage largely accounted for the final yield. Further, yields at TZi were still limited by N availability at the tasseling stage due to fast depletion of applied-N, whereas yields plateaued at TZm once N availability was above 67kgN ha(-1). Our results provided a valuable reference for designing the N management to increase yield, while minimizing the potentially adverse losses of N to the environment, in different agro-ecological zones in SSA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据