4.6 Article

Order conditions for RKN methods solving general second-order oscillatory systems

期刊

NUMERICAL ALGORITHMS
卷 66, 期 1, 页码 147-176

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11075-013-9728-5

关键词

Extended Runge-Kutta-Nystrom type methods; Extended Nystrom trees; Order conditions; Second-order oscillatory systems

资金

  1. NSF of China [11171155, 11271186, 11101357]
  2. Fundamental Research Fund for the Central Universities [Y0201100265]
  3. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20100091110033]
  4. foundation of Shangdong Outstanding Young Scientists Award Project [BS2010SF031]
  5. foundation of Scientific Research Project of Shangdong Universities [J11LG69]
  6. NSF of Shandong Province, China [ZR2011AL006]
  7. Talented Faculty Fund of Nanjing Institute of Technology [YKJ201114]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes and investigates the multidimensional extended Runge-Kutta-Nystrom (ERKN) methods for the general second-order oscillatory system yaEuro(3) + My = f(y, y') where M is a positive semi-definite matrix containing implicitly the frequencies of the problem. The work forms a natural generalization of our previous work on ERKN methods for the special system yaEuro(3) + My = f(y) (H. Yang et al. Extended RKN-type methods for numerical integration of perturbed oscillators, Comput. Phys. Comm. 180 (2009) 1777-1794 and X. Wu et al., ERKN integrators for systems of oscillatory second-order differential equations, Comput. Phys. Comm. 181 (2010) 1873-1887). The new ERKN methods, with coefficients depending on the frequency matrix M, incorporate the special structure of the equation brought by the term My into both internal stages and updates. In order to derive the order conditions for the ERKN methods, an extended Nystrom tree (EN-tree) theory is established. The results of numerical experiments show that the new ERKN methods are more efficient than the general-purpose RK methods and the adapted RKN methods with the same algebraic order in the literature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据