4.8 Article

Comparative ribosome profiling reveals extensive translational complexity in different Trypanosoma brucei life cycle stages

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 42, 期 6, 页码 3623-3637

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkt1386

关键词

-

资金

  1. Young Investigator Program of the Research Center of Infectious Diseases (ZINF) of the University of Wuerzburg, Germany
  2. German Research Foundation DFG [SI 1610/2-1]
  3. Human Frontier Science Program
  4. French National Research Agency [ANR-2010-GENM-011-01]
  5. German Research Foundation (DFG)
  6. University of Wuerzburg

向作者/读者索取更多资源

While gene expression is a fundamental and tightly controlled cellular process that is regulated at multiple steps, the exact contribution of each step remains unknown in any organism. The absence of transcription initiation regulation for RNA polymerase II in the protozoan parasite Trypanosoma brucei greatly simplifies the task of elucidating the contribution of translation to global gene expression. Therefore, we have sequenced ribosome-protected mRNA fragments in T. brucei, permitting the genome-wide analysis of RNA translation and translational efficiency. We find that the latter varies greatly between life cycle stages of the parasite and similar to 100-fold between genes, thus contributing to gene expression to a similar extent as RNA stability. The ability to map ribosome positions at sub-codon resolution revealed extensive translation from upstream open reading frames located within 5' UTRs and enabled the identification of hundreds of previously un-annotated putative coding sequences (CDSs). Evaluation of existing proteomics and genome-wide RNAi data confirmed the translation of previously un-annotated CDSs and suggested an important role for > 200 of those CDSs in parasite survival, especially in the form that is infective to mammals. Overall our data show that translational control plays a prevalent and important role in different parasite life cycle stages of T. brucei.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据