4.8 Article

Rational optimization of tolC as a powerful dual selectable marker for genome engineering

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 42, 期 7, 页码 4779-4790

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkt1374

关键词

-

资金

  1. US Department of Energy [DE-FG02-02ER63445]
  2. US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency [N66001-12-C-4211]
  3. US Department of Defense NDSEG Fellowship
  4. US National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship
  5. Arnold & Mabel Beckman Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Selection has been invaluable for genetic manipulation, although counter-selection has historically exhibited limited robustness and convenience. TolC, an outer membrane pore involved in transmembrane transport in E. coli, has been implemented as a selectable/counter-selectable marker, but counter-selection escape frequency using colicin E1 precludes using tolC for inefficient genetic manipulations and/or with large libraries. Here, we leveraged unbiased deep sequencing of 96 independent lineages exhibiting counter-selection escape to identify loss-of-function mutations, which offered mechanistic insight and guided strain engineering to reduce counter-selection escape frequency by similar to 40-fold. We fundamentally improved the tolC counter-selection by supplementing a second agent, vancomycin, which reduces counter-selection escape by 425-fold, compared colicin E1 alone. Combining these improvements in a mismatch repair proficient strain reduced counter-selection escape frequency by 1.3E6-fold in total, making tolC counter-selection as effective as most selectable markers, and adding a valuable tool to the genome editing toolbox. These improvements permitted us to perform stable and continuous rounds of selection/counter-selection using tolC, enabling replacement of 10 alleles without requiring genotypic screening for the first time. Finally, we combined these advances to create an optimized E. coli strain for genome engineering that is similar to 10-fold more efficient at achieving allelic diversity than previous best practices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据