4.8 Article

Cooperative gene regulation by microRNA pairs and their identification using a computational workflow

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 42, 期 12, 页码 7539-7552

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gku465

关键词

-

资金

  1. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), e:Bio-miRSys [0316175A]
  2. University of Rostock
  3. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) network project GENESIS [BSC0121]
  4. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), e:Bio-SysMet [0316171]
  5. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), e:Med-CAPSyS [01ZX1304]
  6. University Hospital Erlangen
  7. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) network project INDEPTH [BSC0111]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are an integral part of gene regulation at the post-transcriptional level. Recently, it has been shown that pairs of miRNAs can repress the translation of a target mRNA in a cooperative manner, which leads to an enhanced effectiveness and specificity in target repression. However, it remains unclear which miRNA pairs can synergize and which genes are target of cooperative miRNA regulation. In this paper, we present a computational workflow for the prediction and analysis of cooperating miRNAs and their mutual target genes, which we refer to as RNA triplexes. The workflow integrates methods of miRNA target prediction; triplex structure analysis; molecular dynamics simulations and mathematical modeling for a reliable prediction of functional RNA triplexes and target repression efficiency. In a case study we analyzed the human genome and identified several thousand targets of cooperative gene regulation. Our results suggest that miRNA cooperativity is a frequent mechanism for an enhanced target repression by pairs of miRNAs facilitating distinctive and fine-tuned target gene expression patterns. Human RNA triplexes predicted and characterized in this study are organized in a web resource at www.sbi.uni-rostock.de/triplexrna/.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据