4.8 Article

Imogene: identification of motifs and cis-regulatory modules underlying gene co-regulation

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 42, 期 10, 页码 6128-6145

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gku209

关键词

-

资金

  1. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
  2. Ecole Normale Superieure
  3. Institut Pasteur
  4. Agence Nationale pour la Recherche [ANR-08-BLAN-0235]
  5. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-08-BLAN-0235] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cis-regulatory modules (CRMs) and motifs play a central role in tissue and condition-specific gene expression. Here we present Imogene, an ensemble of statistical tools that we have developed to facilitate their identification and implemented in a publicly available software. Starting from a small training set of mammalian or fly CRMs that drive similar gene expression profiles, Imogene determines de novo cis-regulatory motifs that underlie this co-expression. It can then predict on a genome-wide scale other CRMs with a regulatory potential similar to the training set. Imogene bypasses the need of large datasets for statistical analyses by making central use of the information provided by the sequenced genomes of multiple species, based on the developed statistical tools and explicit models for transcription factor binding site evolution. We test Imogene on characterized tissue-specific mouse developmental CRMs. Its ability to identify CRMs with the same specificity based on its de novo created motifs is comparable to that of previously evaluated 'motif-blind' methods. We further show, both in flies and in mammals, that Imogene de novo generated motifs are sufficient to discriminate CRMs related to different developmental programs. Notably, purely relying on sequence data, Imogene performs as well in this discrimination task as a previously reported learning algorithm based on Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) data for multiple transcription factors at multiple developmental stages.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据