4.8 Article

Mapping of six somatic linker histone H1 variants in human breast cancer cells uncovers specific features of H1.2

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 42, 期 7, 页码 4474-4493

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gku079

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion of Spain (MICINN)
  2. FEDER [BFU2011-23057]
  3. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [SAF2012-36199]
  4. Generalitat de Catalunya [2009-SGR-1222]
  5. JAE-Doc contract from CSIC-MICINN
  6. TA contract from CSIC-MICINN
  7. FPU predoctoral fellowship from MICINN
  8. ICREA Funding Source: Custom

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Seven linker histone H1 variants are present in human somatic cells with distinct prevalence across cell types. Despite being key structural components of chromatin, it is not known whether the different variants have specific roles in the regulation of nuclear processes or are differentially distributed throughout the genome. Using variant-specific antibodies to H1 and hemagglutinin (HA)-tagged recombinant H1 variants expressed in breast cancer cells, we have investigated the distribution of six H1 variants in promoters and genome-wide. H1 is depleted at promoters depending on its transcriptional status and differs between variants. Notably, H1.2 is less abundant than other variants at the transcription start sites of inactive genes, and promoters enriched in H1.2 are different from those enriched in other variants and tend to be repressed. Additionally, H1.2 is enriched at chromosomal domains characterized by low guanine-cytosine (GC) content and is associated with lamina-associated domains. Meanwhile, other variants are associated with higher GC content, CpG islands and gene-rich domains. For instance, H1.0 and H1X are enriched at gene-rich chromosomes, whereas H1.2 is depleted. In short, histone H1 is not uniformly distributed along the genome and there are differences between variants, H1.2 being the one showing the most specific pattern and strongest correlation with low gene expression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据