4.8 Article

Translation rate is controlled by coupled trade-offs between site accessibility, selective RNA unfolding and sliding at upstream standby sites

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 42, 期 4, 页码 2646-2659

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkt1139

关键词

-

资金

  1. DARPA Young Faculty Award
  2. Office of Naval Research [N00014-13-1-0074]
  3. National Science Foundation Career Award [CBET-1253641]
  4. Penn State Institute for the Energy and Environment
  5. NSF Research Experience for Undergraduates program
  6. Directorate For Engineering
  7. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1253641] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ribosome's interactions with mRNA govern its translation rate and the effects of post-transcriptional regulation. Long, structured 5' untranslated regions (5' UTRs) are commonly found in bacterial mRNAs, though the physical mechanisms that determine how the ribosome binds these upstream regions remain poorly defined. Here, we systematically investigate the ribosome's interactions with structured standby sites, upstream of Shine-Dalgarno sequences, and show that these interactions can modulate translation initiation rates by over 100-fold. We find that an mRNA's translation initiation rate is controlled by the amount of single-stranded surface area, the partial unfolding of RNA structures to minimize the ribosome's binding free energy penalty, the absence of cooperative binding and the potential for ribosomal sliding. We develop a biophysical model employing thermodynamic first principles and a four-parameter free energy model to accurately predict the ribosome's translation initiation rates for 136 synthetic 5' UTRs with large structures, diverse shapes and multiple standby site modules. The model predicts and experiments confirm that the ribosome can readily bind distant standby site modules that support high translation rates, providing a physical mechanism for observed context effects and long-range post-transcriptional regulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据