4.8 Article

CRISPRmap: an automated classification of repeat conservation in prokaryotic adaptive immune systems

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 41, 期 17, 页码 8034-8044

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkt606

关键词

-

资金

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG) [FOR1680, BA 2168/5-1]
  2. German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD)
  3. Bioinformatics Group, Department of Computer Science, Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Central to Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeat (CRISPR)-Cas systems are repeated RNA sequences that serve as Cas-protein-binding templates. Classification is based on the architectural composition of associated Cas proteins, considering repeat evolution is essential to complete the picture. We compiled the largest data set of CRISPRs to date, performed comprehensive, independent clustering analyses and identified a novel set of 40 conserved sequence families and 33 potential structure motifs for Cas-endoribonucleases with some distinct conservation patterns. Evolutionary relationships are presented as a hierarchical map of sequence and structure similarities for both a quick and detailed insight into the diversity of CRISPR-Cas systems. In a comparison with Cas-subtypes, I-C, I-E, I-F and type II were strongly coupled and the remaining type I and type III subtypes were loosely coupled to repeat and Cas1 evolution, respectively. Subtypes with a strong link to CRISPR evolution were almost exclusive to bacteria; nevertheless, we identified rare examples of potential horizontal transfer of I-C and I-E systems into archaeal organisms. Our easy-to-use web server provides an automated assignment of newly sequenced CRISPRs to our classification system and enables more informed choices on future hypotheses in CRISPR-Cas research: ext-link-type=uri xlink:href=http://rna.informatik.uni-freiburg.de/CRISPRmap xmlns:xlink=http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink>http://rna.informatik.uni-freiburg.de/CRISPRmap.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据