4.8 Article

RNase L restricts the mobility of engineered retrotransposons in cultured human cells

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 42, 期 6, 页码 3803-3820

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkt1308

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute [CA044059]
  2. Maltz Family Foundation
  3. Mal and Lea Bank Chair fund
  4. National Institutes of Health [GM060518]
  5. International postdoctoral fellowship from the Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale (FRM)
  6. NIH Training Grant [T32-GM007315]
  7. NIH, National Cancer Institute [CA044059]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Retrotransposons are mobile genetic elements, and their mobility can lead to genomic instability. Retrotransposon insertions are associated with a diverse range of sporadic diseases, including cancer. Thus, it is not a surprise that multiple host defense mechanisms suppress retrotransposition. The 2',5'-oligoadenylate (2-5A) synthetase (OAS)-RNase L system is a mechanism for restricting viral infections during the interferon antiviral response. Here, we investigated a potential role for the OAS-RNase L system in the restriction of retrotransposons. Expression of wild type (WT) and a constitutively active form of RNase L (N delta 385), but not a catalytically inactive RNase L mutant (R667A), impaired the mobility of engineered human LINE-1 (L1) and mouse intracisternal A-type particle retrotransposons in cultured human cells. Furthermore, WT RNase L, but not an inactive RNase L mutant (R667A), reduced L1 RNA levels and subsequent expression of the L1-encoded proteins (ORF1p and ORF2p). Consistently, confocal immunofluorescent microscopy demonstrated that WT RNase L, but not RNase L R667A, prevented formation of L1 cytoplasmic foci. Finally, siRNA-mediated depletion of endogenous RNase L in a human ovarian cancer cell line (Hey1b) increased the levels of L1 retrotransposition by similar to 2-fold. Together, these data suggest that RNase L might function as a suppressor of structurally distinct retrotransposons.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据