4.8 Article

The RNA exosome complex central channel controls both exonuclease and endonuclease Dis3 activities in vivo and in vitro

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 41, 期 6, 页码 3845-3858

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkt060

关键词

-

资金

  1. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education [0737/B/P01/2011/40]
  2. Foundation for Polish Science Team Programme
  3. EU [TEAM/2008-2/1]
  4. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education
  5. European Social Fund [UDA-POKL.04.01.01-00-072/09-00]
  6. European Union-the European Regional Development Fund [200713, POIG.02.02.00-14-024/08-00]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The RNA exosome is an essential ribonuclease complex involved in RNA processing and decay. It consists of a 9-subunit catalytically inert ring composed of six RNase PH-like proteins forming a central channel and three cap subunits with KH/S1 domains located at the top. The yeast exosome catalytic activity is supplied by the Dis3 (also known as Rrp44) protein, which has both endo- and exoribonucleolytic activities and the nucleus-specific exonuclease Rrp6. In vitro studies suggest that substrates reach the Dis3 exonucleolytic active site following passage through the ring channel, but in vivo support is lacking. Here, we constructed an Rrp41 ring subunit mutant with a partially blocked channel that led to thermosensitivity and synthetic lethality with Rrp6 deletion. Rrp41 mutation caused accumulation of nuclear and cytoplasmic exosome substrates including the non-stop decay reporter, for which degradation is dependent on either endonucleolytic or exonucleolytic Dis3 activities. This suggests that the central channel also controls endonucleolytic activity. In vitro experiments performed using Chaetomium thermophilum exosomes reconstituted from recombinant subunits confirmed this notion. Finally, we analysed the impact of a lethal mutation of conserved basic residues in Rrp4 cap subunit and found that it inhibits digestion of single-stranded and structured RNA substrates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据