4.8 Article

TIGRFAMs and Genome Properties in 2013

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 41, 期 D1, 页码 D387-D395

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gks1234

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Human Genome Research Institute [R01 HG004881]
  2. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services [N01-AI30071, HHSN272200900007C]
  3. NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE [R01HG004881] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

TIGRFAMs, available online at http://www.jcvi.org/tigrfams is a database of protein family definitions. Each entry features a seed alignment of trusted representative sequences, a hidden Markov model (HMM) built from that alignment, cutoff scores that let automated annotation pipelines decide which proteins are members, and annotations for transfer onto member proteins. Most TIGRFAMs models are designated equivalog, meaning they assign a specific name to proteins conserved in function from a common ancestral sequence. Models describing more functionally heterogeneous families are designated subfamily or domain, and assign less specific but more widely applicable annotations. The Genome Properties database, available at ext-link-type=uri xlink:href=http://www.jcvi.org/genome-properties xmlns:xlink=http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink>http://www.jcvi.org/genome-properties, specifies how computed evidence, including TIGRFAMs HMM results, should be used to judge whether an enzymatic pathway, a protein complex or another type of molecular subsystem is encoded in a genome. TIGRFAMs and Genome Properties content are developed in concert because subsystems reconstruction for large numbers of genomes guides selection of seed alignment sequences and cutoff values during protein family construction. Both databases specialize heavily in bacterial and archaeal subsystems. At present, 4284 models appear in TIGRFAMs, while 628 systems are described by Genome Properties. Content derives both from subsystem discovery work and from biocuration of the scientific literature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据