4.8 Article

INTERFEROME v2.0: an updated database of annotated interferon-regulated genes

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 41, 期 D1, 页码 D1040-D1046

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gks1215

关键词

-

资金

  1. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council
  2. Australian National Data Service
  3. Australian Research Council's Centre of Excellence in Structural and Functional Microbial Genomics
  4. Universite Paris Descartes
  5. Victorian Government
  6. Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Structural and Functional Microbial Genomics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Interferome v2.0 (http://interferome.its.monash.edu.au/interferome/) is an update of an earlier version of the Interferome DB published in the 2009 NAR database edition. Vastly improved computational infrastructure now enables more complex and faster queries, and supports more data sets from types I, II and III interferon (IFN)-treated cells, mice or humans. Quantitative, MIAME compliant data are collected, subjected to thorough, standardized, quantitative and statistical analyses and then significant changes in gene expression are uploaded. Comprehensive manual collection of metadata in v2.0 allows flexible, detailed search capacity including the parameters: range of -fold change, IFN type, concentration and time, and cell/tissue type. There is no limit to the number of genes that can be used to search the database in a single query. Secondary analysis such as gene ontology, regulatory factors, chromosomal location or tissue expression plots of IFN-regulated genes (IRGs) can be performed in Interferome v2.0, or data can be downloaded in convenient text formats compatible with common secondary analysis programs. Given the importance of IFN to innate immune responses in infectious, inflammatory diseases and cancer, this upgrade of the Interferome to version 2.0 will facilitate the identification of gene signatures of importance in the pathogenesis of these diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据