4.8 Article

Sensitive and label-free biosensing of RNA with predicted secondary structures by a triplex affinity capture method

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 40, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkr1304

关键词

-

资金

  1. EECC [FP7-NMP-213382-2]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Education [BFU2007-63287, CTQ2010-20541, TEC2009-08729, AGL2010-17181]
  3. CIBER-BBN [The Biomedical Research Networking center in Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine]
  4. VI National RDi Plan
  5. Iniciativa Ingenio
  6. Consolider Program
  7. CIBER Actions
  8. Instituto de Salud Carlos III
  9. Generalitat de Catalunya [2009/SGR/208]
  10. M. Botin Foundation
  11. European Regional Development Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel biosensing approach for the label-free detection of nucleic acid sequences of short and large lengths has been implemented, with special emphasis on targeting RNA sequences with secondary structures. The approach is based on selecting 8-aminoadenine-modified parallel-stranded DNA tail-clamps as affinity bioreceptors. These receptors have the ability of creating a stable triplex-stranded helix at neutral pH upon hybridization with the nucleic acid target. A surface plasmon resonance biosensor has been used for the detection. With this strategy, we have detected short DNA sequences (32-mer) and purified RNA (103-mer) at the femtomol level in a few minutes in an easy and level-free way. This approach is particularly suitable for the detection of RNA molecules with predicted secondary structures, reaching a limit of detection of 50 fmol without any label or amplification steps. Our methodology has shown a marked enhancement for the detection (18% for short DNA and 54% for RNA), when compared with the conventional duplex approach, highlighting the large difficulty of the duplex approach to detect nucleic acid sequences, especially those exhibiting stable secondary structures. We believe that our strategy could be of great interest to the RNA field.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据