4.8 Article

Flap endonucleases pass 5′-flaps through a flexible arch using a disorder-thread-order mechanism to confer specificity for free 5′-ends

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 40, 期 10, 页码 4507-4519

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gks051

关键词

-

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBF0147321]
  2. European Community [PIIF-GA-2009-254386]
  3. National Cancer Institute [RO1 CA081967, P01 CA092584]
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [REI18458] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Flap endonucleases (FENs), essential for DNA replication and repair, recognize and remove RNA or DNA 5'-flaps. Related to FEN specificity for substrates with free 5'-ends, but controversial, is the role of the helical arch observed in varying conformations in substrate-free FEN structures. Conflicting models suggest either 5'-flaps thread through the arch, which when structured can only accommodate single-stranded (ss) DNA, or the arch acts as a clamp. Here we show that free 5'-termini are selected using a disorder-thread-order mechanism. Adding short duplexes to 5'-flaps or 3'-streptavidin does not markedly impair the FEN reaction. In contrast, reactions of 5'-streptavidin substrates are drastically slowed. However, when added to premixed FEN and 5'-biotinylated substrate, streptavidin is not inhibitory and complexes persist after challenge with unlabelled competitor substrate, regardless of flap length or the presence of a short duplex. Cross-linked flap duplexes that cannot thread through the structured arch react at modestly reduced rate, ruling out mechanisms involving resolution of secondary structure. Combined results explain how FEN avoids cutting template DNA between Okazaki fragments and link local FEN folding to catalysis and specificity: the arch is disordered when flaps are threaded to confer specificity for free 5'-ends, with subsequent ordering of the arch to catalyze hydrolysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据