4.8 Article

Atlas of Genetics and Cytogenetics in Oncology and Haematology in 2013

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 41, 期 D1, 页码 D920-D924

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gks1082

关键词

-

资金

  1. Association des Cytogeneticiens de Langue Francaise
  2. Dutch Working Group of Tumor Cytogenetics (WHGD)
  3. European Regional Development Fund
  4. French Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research
  5. Poitiers University Foundation
  6. French National League against Cancer
  7. Cancer Cytogenomics Microarray Consortium US
  8. Berufsverband Deutscher Humangenetiker
  9. French Ministry of Research
  10. Belgian Society of Human Genetics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Atlas of Genetics and Cytogenetics in Oncology and Haematology (http://AtlasGeneticsOncology.org) is a peer-reviewed internet journal/encyclopaedia/database focused on genes implicated in cancer, cytogenetics and clinical entities in cancer and cancer-prone hereditary diseases. The main goal of the Atlas is to provide review articles that describe complementary topics, namely, genes, genetic abnormalities, histopathology, clinical diagnoses and a large iconography. This description, which was historically based on karyotypic abnormalities and in situ hybridization (fluorescence in situ hybridization) techniques, now benefits from comparative genomic hybridization and massive sequencing, uncovering a tremendous amount of genetic rearrangements. As the Atlas combines different types of information (genes, genetic abnormalities, histopathology, clinical diagnoses and external links), its content is currently unique. The Atlas is a cognitive tool for fundamental and clinical research and has developed into an encyclopaedic work. In clinical practice, it contributes to the cytogenetic diagnosis and may guide treatment decision making, particularly regarding rare diseases (because they are numerous and are frequently encountered). Readers as well as the authors of the Atlas are researchers and/or clinicians.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据