4.8 Article

Long non-coding RNAs function annotation: a global prediction method based on bi-colored networks

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 41, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gks967

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [60933009, 91130006, 31071137]
  2. Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation [5122029]
  3. National Center for Mathematics and Interdisciplinary Sciences, CAS, Knowledge Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [KSCX2-EW-R-01]
  4. Beijing Institutes of Life Science, the Chinese Academy of Sciences [2010-Biols-CAS-0301]
  5. National Program on Key Basic Research Project [2009CB825400]
  6. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu province [BK2008231]
  7. Sci-tech Innovation Team of Jiangsu University [2008-018-02]
  8. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [K5051223005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

More and more evidences demonstrate that the long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) play many key roles in diverse biological processes. There is a critical need to annotate the functions of increasing available lncRNAs. In this article, we try to apply a global network-based strategy to tackle this issue for the first time. We develop a bi-colored network based global function predictor, long non-coding RNA global function predictor ('lnc-GFP'), to predict probable functions for lncRNAs at large scale by integrating gene expression data and protein interaction data. The performance of lnc-GFP is evaluated on protein-coding and lncRNA genes. Cross-validation tests on protein-coding genes with known function annotations indicate that our method can achieve a precision up to 95%, with a suitable parameter setting. Among the 1713 lncRNAs in the bi-colored network, the 1625 (94.9%) lncRNAs in the maximum connected component are all functionally characterized. For the lncRNAs expressed in mouse embryo stem cells and neuronal cells, the inferred putative functions by our method highly match those in the known literature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据